Friday 20 July 2012

Reading For Right Society


Prophesy from the Hopi Nation
By Thomas Banyacya, Sr., (1910-1999)
Speaker of the Wolf, Fox and Coyote Clan,
Elder of the Hopi Nation

You have been telling the people
That this is the eleventh hour.
Now, you must go and tell the people
That THIS is the hour,
And there are things to be considered.

Where are you living?  What are you doing?
What are your relationships?
Are you in the right relationship?
Where is your water?
Know your garden.

It is time to speak your truth.
Create your community.
Be good to each other.
Do not look outside of yourself for a leader.

There is a river flowing now very fast.
It is so great and swift
That there are those who will be afraid.
They will try to hold onto the shore.
They will feel they are being pulled apart
And will suffer greatly.







Understand that the river knows its destination.
The elders say we must let go of the shore,
Push off into the middle of the river,
Keep our eyes open and our heads above water.

And I say: see who is in there with you.
Hold fast to them and celebrate!

At this time in history
We are to take nothing personally.
Least of all ourselves!
For the moment we do,
Our spiritual growth and journey comes to an end.
The time of the Lone Wolf is over!

Gather yourselves!
Banish the word “struggle” from
Your attitude and vocabulary.
All that we do now must be done
In a sacred manner and in celebration.

We are all about to go on a journey.
We are the ones we have been waiting for.

Right Society


Right Society
                                                                                                                                             
Who would have imagined that there would be so many people ready and willing to form Occupy Movements across Canada?. …ready to pitch their tents and live in the streets, threatening to stay out there all through the Canadian winter.  ---Street people,  unemployed, students, and working people are all there.  How brave they were.  Or foolhardy?  I remember my student protest days.  The bravest thing I ever did was walk in a peace march in the days when the police were relaxed and friendly.

I remember when we didn’t have street people.  We didn’t have food banks.  The welfare cheques provided enough for people to pay rent and buy food.  People who had jobs didn’t need food banks and shelters.  What changed?  Why did we allow it?  I know I’ve been out there on the streets often enough with my various banners.  (Ron had no idea what he was signing up for when he decided to marry me.)  I know many of you have been out there with me.  Sometimes it feels like a lesson in impotence, but we keep on doing it because to say nothing would be worse.

There is no question in my mind that Occupy Wall Street is an outgrowth of the Arab Spring.  The Maple Spring (Le Printemps d’Érable) may be motivated by the same energy.  The spirit of a radically different, more participative democracy is stirring in Canada.  It is the same energy that motivates the Greeks to fight cutbacks that will only put more people in the poor and destitute class while the upper classes get richer.  The people of the world know what is wrong with our systems, and they know things must change.

On the 9th of November 1989, the Berlin Wall fell.  It was reported as the great victory of capitalism over communism.  Since then, most of the communist countries have begun a process of allowing market forces to come into play in their economies.  But I would like to propose that the meaning of the fall of the Berlin wall is not the victory of capitalism over communism.  Rather it was the fall of a particular, totalitarian system that didn’t work because it was not meeting the needs of its people.

Capitalism has many proud achievements.  It’s greatest feature is its ability to unleash human ingenuity and creativity.  Under this system we learned how to use the natural resources of the earth, to make tools and machines that increased our capacity to work many times.  We learned how to grow food to feed billions, and to make even more clothing and manufactured goods than we could use.

We also learned how to make the greatest amount of junk that nobody either needs or wants.  Once you have a factory in place you have to keep making stuff and selling it, the more the better.  Capitalism depends on growth as the road to success.  But what do we do when we use up all the land and resources?   As Peter Victor (Economist at York University) puts it, will we learn to live without growth by design, or will we keep our heads in the sand until disaster strikes and chaos erupts. 

The first year after the Berlin wall fell, the people starved while the potatoes rotted in the fields because nobody knew who was supposed to gather them.  The next decade was a decade run by gangsters and thugs.  Is our fall going to look just as ugly?  Maybe that’s why the Harper government is equipping our police with state of the art riot gear and building jails to house double the current Canadian prison population when the crime rate is going down!

The Hopi Elder tells us we are in a time when the river will be flowing very fast, but we must hold on to our true selves, let go of the edge and keep our heads above water.  The river knows its destination. 

Louise McDiarmid (from the UU Fellowship of Ottawa) asks, “Is this the time of The Great Turning?  She speaks of the work of David Korten.  (The Great Turning and Agenda For A New Economy.)  He sees the world as facing a perfect storm of three converging crises:  climate change, peak oil, and a financial crisis caused by an unbalanced economy.  These crises present significant threats, but also great opportunities for fundamental change.

Louise writes, “The “Earth Community” that Korten speaks of is a sustainable, just, and caring community, in which people are responsible for and accountable to one another.  Three years ago, I thought that this was a Utopian dream, that those who held the reins of power would never budge from their domination of economics, politics and the media;  that 90% of the 99% would never wake up and imagine that another way of life was possible.  Now I wonder:  is the Occupy Movement a sign that The Great Turning has begun?”   

I think Occupy Wallstreet is a movement to challenge the moral underpinnings of society; to call us to change our moral focus.  We ask them what they want.  To make a list of demands. That’s not their job. They are like the Hebrew prophets, calling us to a change of heart. 

Since 1970 we have been allowing right-wing conservatives and republicans to define the moral agenda.  The result is Bill Gates, with all his and Warren Buffet’s money, trying to fix the world and in the process, make major policy decisions for developing countries.  Private moguls amass wealth and put stability and security at risk all around the world through the arms trade. According to Rev. Fred Cappuccino, scientific studies have shown that if you have the courage to chase these arms purveyors out of town you will sleep 64.8% better at night.  Instead, we continue to worry as our leaders refuse to address the challenges of our times and to plan for new ways.

Meanwhile the banks and corporations, hand-in-hand with unrepresentative governments, strip our jobs, strip our democracy, steal our resources, and pay their executives bonuses based on performance.  The growth in inequality escalates. One would have to think that they actually want the world to fall into chaos.

An unmanaged market system has the following flaws:
·      The only goal of private corporations is to maximize profit for shareholders.  When they get so big they can usurp the power of government there is no one to speak for the people, the family, the community, or the earth
·      It is hard hearted.  There is no mechanism to support the poor.  This generates descending cycles of misery, poverty, and violence.
·      Whether you are wealthy or not is mostly the luck of the draw.  It is a myth that those who work hard will have financial success.  Most wealth is inherited and most on the lower end of the scale cannot escape the vicious cycle of poverty no matter how hard they work.
·      Only things that have a price have value. Things that have no price are outside the system and therefore, not counted.  Housework and childcare have little or no value.  The filtration services of trees and swamps have no value. 
·      Adam Smith said that to truly have a free market you can’t have monopolies.  The corporate world is in an orgy of mergers and acquisitions.  A report I read suggested that perhaps as few as 114 families own the vast majority of the wealth of the world.  We do not live in a world of free markets.  We live in a world of unfettered corporate power.

Markets cannot be unfettered.  They must be subservient to the larger goals of the society.  There must be checks and balances that allow different interests to be in dialogue.  The systems and structures of society must serve all people and not just the top one percent.

Between 1940 and 1970 the western world conducted a big experiment.  We decided to give a larger role to government, using taxes to redistribute wealth and bring greater equality.  To avoid another depression we put money in people’s pockets so they could spend it and buy things and the economy would thrive.  Universal programs such as healthcare, education, child benefit programs, and old-aged pensions helped everyone equally – rich or poor.  They were rights of citizenship so no one felt degraded to take them.  No bureaucrat had the power to give or take away.  Everyone had the basics and could live with dignity.  A solid base for all Canadians made it possible, for the first time, for people to work to achieve their potential – and not just scratch to survive.  Canada enjoyed a long period of peace and prosperity and shared its vision for peace with the world.  Today, the Nordic countries continue to enjoy the benefits of this approach.

If the differences in wealth are small, people experience more inclusion, more trust, less stress, and more well-being.  “Imagine living somewhere where 90 per cent of the population mistrusts one another!  What would that mean for the quality of everyday life?—the interactions between people at work, on the street, in shops, in schools.” (Wilkinson and Pickett).  Striving for status is a trap, leaving us stuck on the insatiable wheel of desire, suffering and cut-throat competition.

Equality brings better outcomes in health and well-being, education, mental health, reduced violence and incarceration, improved child welfare, improved status of women, improved social stability, reduced addiction problems and much more.

But since Regan’s presidency, our society has been shifting step by step, to a society based on individual responsibility with a few winners and many losers.  The tools we had set up to redistribute wealth to the poor were removed. There has been a great transfer of wealth to the rich with no accountability to use that benefit for the welfare of all.  Without regulation, capitalism leads unswervingly toward greater inequality.

But as inequality grows, do we see the truth?  Sometimes I just want to tear my hair out I get so crazy.  We close the factory or fire civil servants and then blame the worker for choosing unemployment.  We pass mandatory minimum sentences for minor drug offences and then put kids in jail. We raise the interest rates and whole countries go bankrupt.  We see countries in trouble so we bail out the banks. We’re running a deficit so we cut taxes and give juicy contracts to corporations for military production.  Then we take the money out of the hides of the poor.

Social conservatives hate the poor.  They ask, “If welfare is too sweet, why would people work?  All you get from those people is dependency for generations.”  “Who pays for that,”.  “I don’t want to!” they cry out.

This assumes that given a choice, people would choose not to work.  Young women, for example, will choose to freeload on society and have babies rather than work.  Have they looked at the cost of diapers lately?  Let alone the cost of rent and food?  Have they checked out how it feels to ask for a 3-day emergency supply of food at a food bank?!  Who would choose that if they didn’t have to?  Our complex system of programs creates a tangle of rules and regulations to make sure nobody can collect and a bureaucracy to watch for cheating.  Then when desperate, hungry people try to get around the rules, they are accused of moral depravity.

A system that knocks people out of work, forces them to use their assets before they can receive benefits, and then degrades them by refusing enough assistance to cover rent and food, -- such a system makes people bad.  It pushes them to the point of desperation.  This is not a recipe for a healthy, stable society.  The vision of an unfettered market and everyone working to satisfy their own greed is not working.

We want the market to serve the community, not the community to serve the market.  We want checks and balances between the state, the individual, and the marketplace.   Each needs its own realm of power and influence.  A right society will capture some of the strengths of socialism and of capitalism and will go beyond both.

We must begin by getting beyond our denial and our addictions to open our eyes and see the truth.  We need spiritual healing.  An important step in this healing process would be to address the bad relationships that fester in our society. We must commit ourselves to respectful relations with First Nations including honouring our treaties with them. 

We must move from a growth-based to a sustainable economy.  Where the problem was once how to produce enough to feed and clothe the world, now the problem is what to do with all the garbage.  Andrew Nikiforuk, author of Tar Sands, says growth is but an adolescent phase of life . . . continued growth in the period of maturity is called obesity or cancer.  Prescribing growth as the cure for the energy crisis has all the logic of prescribing increasing quantities of food as a remedy for obesity.

We need our best minds in economics, the social sciences, political science and law to create new social systems.  We need larger goals than individual profit but we still need individual initiative and innovation.  People need to work for a living, but they don’t need to work making weapons or destroying the environment.  We need to re-imagine a banking system that will allow governments to finance the work that needs to be done – in food production, health care, education, municipal infrastructure, and protection of the environment.  We need a social safety net that will share the work, and will give worth and dignity to those who can’t work or who are caught in transition with all the changes.  Perhaps a universal, guaranteed annual income can be structured so that everyone has basic needs met.  People would work to improve their lot above that level.

We need strong democratic processes based on full disclosure of information, the best knowledge science can give us, a well-educated public, and a fair system of representation of the full diversity of the population.  We need proportional representation.

We need a big public discussion on how to approach food production and energy security in a post-peak-oil world.  We need a national plan for energy security.  Let it be based on common sense.  Andrew Nikiforuk suggests “Using natural gas to develop oil sands is like using caviar as fertilizer to grow turnips!”

We need politicians who will tell us the truth about what is necessary to build this new society.  People will need to prepare to simplify their lives and reduce their expectations.  We need parties that value the principle of equality.  We need to plan and build social structures to help us make the very hard transition ahead to a low-oil, slow or no growth economy.  We have a lot to learn.  G.A. Cohen says: “We know how to make an economic system work on the basis of selfishness.  We do not know how to make it work on the basis of generosity.”  (G.A.Cohen CH4, Democratic Equality) 

But most of all we need a Canadian people who have not given up hope and are engaged in the public discussion.  I have written three sermons in my time on the subject of Faith.  I am obsessed with this topic because now, more than ever, we need faith that our actions matter and that what we do can make a difference.

We need new leaders with creative new vision who are prepared to experiment and develop the new directions we need.  We must believe that the power of love can push away greed, and influence power.  We must convince our politicians to work together to confront our challenges.  We must practice dialogue and non-violent change.  We need major, constructive discussions on the tar sands – not confrontative processes that will lead to a battle between government, First Nations, and environmentalists.  If we want peace and prosperity around the world we must find the new Keynes who will show us the way.  We have two jobs – First: to actively seek out and promote the ideas that will help us move forward.  Join with transition town to plan our future.  Second: we must stand against injustice.  We must try to slow Harper down as he races to dismantle our democracy and our environmental protections. 

Let reverence for life in all its forms be the foundation of our spiritual life.  Let us embrace the opening offered to us by Occupy Wall Street and Maple Spring and get involved.  Can we take back the reins of power and build a sustainable Earth Community for future generations to enjoy?  I hope Louise is right.   I hope we are witnessing the beginning of The Great Turning!

All Our Relations

Bibliography

Democratic Equality
What Went Wrong?
Edited by Ed Broadbent
University of Toronto Press
©2001

Agenda For a New Economy
From Phantom Wealth to Real Wealth
(Why Wall Street Can’t be Fixed and How to Replace It.)
by David C. Korten
Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA
2009, by the People Centred Development Forum

The Great Turning

From Empire to Earth Community

By David  C. Korten
Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.  San Francisco, ©2006

Louise McDiarmid – UUFO Newsletter, November 201

Tar Sands,
Dirty Oil and the Future of a Continent,
Revised edition
By Andrew Nikiforuk
Winner of the Rachel Carsen Environment Book Award
David Suzuki Foundation and Greystone Books
©2010

Managing Without Growth
Slower by Design, Not Disaster
By Peter A. Victor
Advances in Ecological Economics Series
(Series Editor:  Jeroen C.JM. Van Den Bergh)
Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
The Lypiatts
15 Lansdown Road
Cheltenham
Glos GL50 2JA, UK
© 2008

The Spirit Level
Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger
By Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett
Bloomsbury Press, New York, Berlin, London ©2009

Monday 16 July 2012

In Praise of Universality


Blog 2012 07 16 – Universality

I am often conscious that my parents’ generation had a vision of universality in social programs.  My parents saw this as meaning several important things:
  1. Everyone would pay into the programs and everyone would be equally eligible to benefit from them regardless of need.
  2. Such programs would be society’s way to make sure that everyone had a basic standard of living and of security no matter what catastrophe’s may happen.  We are our brother’s keeper.
  3. It was understood that such programs would reduce inequalities and give everyone a fair chance at a good life.
  4. It was understood that as individuals, we had to take care of ourselves and take care not to overuse the system so that the system would work. 
  5. We would need a strong culture of mutual responsibility, one for the other.  The universality programs formed part of a social contract where people would have the right to fair employment and the responsibility to contribute to the fabric of society through working and paying taxes so that the system would work.

I have often thought that in my generation we have been gradually dismantling those programs – to my great sadness.  It seems that the word “universality” is not popular any more.  We hear questions like, “why pay for a rich person to have a benefit they don’t need and don’t want?”  We hear statements like, “Shouldn’t people be responsible for themselves?”

I have felt great attraction to these ideas about individual freedom and responsibility for self.  These libertarian ideas where there is no role for government and every person should take care of oneself seem attractive when your only goal is to be independent and to do whatever you want.  But the generation just leaving us now had seen the great depression.  They understood that to end up on the rails and begging for a day’s work and a bowl of soup is a possibility for anyone no matter how personally responsible they are and no matter how hard they work.  You can’t always do what you want and sometimes you need help.  They understood the power of working together for the common good.

Universality helps reduce the inequality between classes.  We learned from Wilkinson and Picket in The Spirit Level that a more equal society has better social outcomes of all types than a more unequal society.  It produces more stability, less violence, better health and education and more opportunity.

In Ed Broadbent’s book, Democratic Equality, I found a very clear explanation for why “Universality” is very important, and why we should not let it go, but rather reclaim it for ourselves and for generations to come:

  • Bo Rothstein makes the case that the main source of the escalating differences between Sweden, for example, and the USA is whether the programs are universal or selective.  She finds unqualified support for universal programs.  Selective programs, requiring criteria and a means test, for example, are invasive of personal privacy, strip people of dignity, and are prone to problems of procedural justice.  Bureaucrats have to find some reason to justify their decisions – even if it is arbitrary.  There is a cycle of cheating, getting tough, and more cheating. P18, Democratic Equality.  I interpret this to mean that selective systems create bully bureaucrats and cheaters.  We make people bad instead of creating a climate for them to find their dignity and climb out of their poverty.  Universal systems provide a climate of worth and dignity and hope.
  • If a program is universal, it’s benefit is a right.  If a program is selective, then it is altruistic – the rich taking care of the poor.  Where do you draw the line between who gives and who gets?  What is fair?  Do the needy deserve help or are they to blame for their own distress?  You avoid the control game – one side suspicious, looking for cheating and increasing the controls.  The other engaged in more evasion, lying, and cheating trying to avoid the controls. P20 Democratic Equality
  • A universal policy is easier and cheaper to implement.  It requires fewer bureaucrats who have to make fewer decisions.  Because there is no cheating dynamic, you don’t need large numbers of enforcers or investigators.  There are fewer issues of abuse of power.  This is demonstrated by the United States having the highest health care costs in the world without the best health outcomes.
  • Sweden deliberately chose universal social programs as a way of avoiding the problems of procedural justice.  It is not clear if the program actually saves enough money to pay for the costs of the needs of the poor but it definitely creates a more stable society (P21 Democratic Equality)
  • In a universal system, the demand comes from the majority of the population.  If you took all the social programs in Sweden away, the people would still want education, healthcare, unemployment programs, and so on.  They would just have to buy insurance or otherwise pay for them out of their own pockets.  It would likely cost them a lot more.  If people chose not to buy insurance when they were young, when they got old we would still have to take care of them.  There is no evidence a democratic government can just let people rot because they didn’t plan ahead and catastrophe struck.  (p21)
  • “. . . the Nordic type of welfare state is not an altruistic luxury established to take care of ‘the poor’. . .  Since the demand for social insurance and social services exists, the costs will be there, whether or not the demand is filled by government provision or market forces.  Most of the evidence seems to show that, due to the problem of asymmetric information in this area, mandatory and universal systems are more cost-efficient than private insurance systems. P27 Democratic Equality
  • in the mid 1980’s, 54% of single-parent families in the USA and 46% in Canada lived in poverty compared to only 6% in the Netherlands and 7% in Sweden.  Out of 100,000 population, 580 were in prison in the USA compared to only 40 in Scandinavian countries.  Surely poverty could be a primary reason for this difference. P28  We note as Harper cuts social programs he is simultaneously planning for more prisons -- all likely if predicted consequences of Bill C-10 come through.

This is the battle the Quebec Students are fighting for in the Maple Spring.  Universal Education.
This is why we must fight for proper education funding for our schools at all levels.  This is why we must fight for single-tier universal health and promote the addition of pharmacare and dentacare.

But the big discussion must always be – how generous should the universal programs be? How will we finance them?  And how do we solve the problems of growing dependency if too many draw out and not enough contribute?  Why would anyone work if we had, for example, a guaranteed annual income system to redistribute wealth.

These are hard questions and will be explored further in future blogs, but for now, let us just say – the stresses that we feel in our society today – the global financial crisis; the loss of high quality jobs in favour of growth in the retail sector; the loss of jobs to other countries; the deep disparity between the rich and the poor that grows every day; the increasing number of catastrophic weather events as climate change accelerates; the potential conflict as oil and other resources decline in availability – these stresses must be addressed one way or another.  Either we will plan for a complete social restructuring of our society and put in place compassionate universal social programs to cushion the blow, or we will face increased chaos, public unrest, instability and violence.  Governments will move away from democracy towards police states.

Clarence Skinner was the great social justice minister for Universalism in the twentieth century.  In his book, What Religion Means To Me, (p14) He said:

“To me the highest type of religious experience is that which gives man a sense of unity and universality.  Most of our life is spent in narrow segments.  Our horizon is hemmed about by kitchen walls, office desks, narrow prejudices of race, class or creed.  In [our Universalist] religion, these partialisms, broken fragments of life, are lifted into a vast and profound oneness.  Our littleness becomes stretched to cosmic greatness.”

Let us all promote the values of universality and mutual responsibility one for the other in Canada and around the world.