Opening Our Eyes to the Spiritual Imperatives of Our
Time -- Reading
James Luther Adams
“The institutional
ingredient [for true democracy] is the right of free association – the freedom
to form or belong to voluntary associations that can bring about innovation or
criticism in the society. It is a
fragile freedom, often under attack because it represents a dynamic force for
change. It brings about differentiation
in the community, a separation of powers. “Voluntaryism . . . refers to
a principal way in which the individual through association with others gets a
piece of the action. It involves an exercise of power through
organization. It is the means by which
the individual participates in the process of making social decisions. This process, particularly when it affects
public policy, requires struggle, for in some fashion it generally entails a
reshaping and perhaps even a redistribution of power.”
He goes on to
point out that voluntary organizations are a messy business. Paying for a place to meet, developing
leadership and being able to motivate your volunteers, and getting access to
the media to get your message out are on-going challenges. Thousands of different voluntary
organizations are doing this, hoping to influence the direction of society. We hope that the government is listening and
will represent the public good and the public consensus, because the state
possesses the ultimate authority and power to decide. “In this congeries of associations we see the
dispersion of power and group creativity characteristic in principle of a
pluralistic democratic society.”p58
(Will someone tell Mr. Harper?)
Jane Mansbridge (president of the American Political Science Assoc. and Harvard
Professor) writes: “People are most
likely to come to understand their real interests in a small democracy, like a
town or a workplace, where members make a conscious effort to choose democratic
procedures appropriate to the various issues that arise.”
John Stuart Mill: “We do not learn to read and write, to ride or swim, by being merely
told how to do it, but by doing it, so it is only by practicing popular
government on a limited scale, that the people will ever learn how to exercise
it on a larger.”
In his book, What Then Must We Do? Democratizing wealth and building a
community sustaining economy from the ground up, Par Alperobitz proposes it
is time for us to imagine the alternative to corporate capitalism as a way to
organize the economic structure of society.
As the Occupy Movement clearly demonstrated, corporate capitalism is not
working for the vast majority of people.
It has not demonstrated the capacity to address the imperatives of our
time: climate change; world poverty; the
need for economic institutions that are not required to grow; democracy and peace;
Justice and freedom. But how do we
initiate a true transformation of society, and how do we muster the political
will to make this change?
P139 “The modern civil rights movement, the
feminist movement, the gay rights movement, [the fall of the Berlin wall, the
Arab Spring,] even the modern conservative movement . . . all rose to major
power without benefit of pundit prediction.
Indeed, the success of all these movements was quite contrary to the
conventional wisdom at the time, which held that nothing serious could change.” Many happened after years of hard struggle by
people with vision who may not have seen the changes in their own lives.
Alperovitz’s says we are in such a time of change now. The changes are brewing, percolating,
emerging. His vision is for a
democratization of wealth.
He sees us “Slowly building an alternative basis of the economy in local
communities and states through democratization strategies.” – Don’t wait. Let the seeds of the future be sown in the
ground of the present.
Across North America a checkerboard of
municipal and state possibilities – are already emerging, demonstrating the
potential democratization of wealth.
When the traditional strategies of job creation through tax incentives
and infrastructure gifts didn’t work, city after city across the United States
has begun to invent new strategies: public utilities, land trusts, private
public joint ownership, community development corporations, and outright public
ownership of retail and commercial enterprises—even public banks. Meanwhile innovative workers are initiating
worker ownership and control through pension plans, cooperatives, and other
means, and farmers and consumers are building the local food movement.
This “possibility
of a certain longer-term evolutionary institution-building and institution-shifting
strategy—[is] not for the faint of heart or for the short-term,
instant-gratification folks among us.”
He calls the process of “building institutions, workplaces and cultures
concerned with democratizing wealth evolutionary
reconstruction.”
Frances
Deverell:
While it is too often necessary to stand up and be counted, whether it
be against injustice in Palestine or with our own First Nations, or against
building our future on an expansion of the tar sands, it is spiritually
draining to be constantly on the defensive, standing up to stop what we don’t
want. It is far more empowering to
outline the future you most want to see, and to start building it – step by
step.
No comments:
Post a Comment